List of academic databases and search engines

Navigation menu

Data, Trends and Maps
Nature Care College extends its reach and communication with our current students, alumni, partners and general public through social media platforms. This is a dynamic list and may never be able to satisfy particular standards for completeness. Philosophy Documentation Center [82]. Once a person is a beneficiary of the Supplemental Security Income SSI Program he or she may be automatically eligible for Food Stamps depending on his or her state's laws. Free searching; Subscription full-text.

Popular Content

Malnutrition

Office of the Secretary Government Securities Associated Persons. The National Office maintains one of these systems. The information in this notice applies to all 62 offices. The information in this notice applies to all eight of the offices. Duplicate Personnel Files and Automated Records.

This notice covers six unique systems of records of related subject matter. This notice covers 22 unique systems of records involving related subject matter. Immigration and Naturalization Service U. Citizenship Certificate Application and Appointment Records. Regarding our People Finder and Research services: In operation since , we are information specialists, helping thousands who have lost contact with friends, schoolmates, and biological parents and have been specialists in this field for the past decade.

Our professional researchers are experts in searching, retrieving and obtaining court record and other documents nationwide and compiling this information in reports that are easy to understand. We take the worry out of hiring new staff members and leasing to new tenants by researching these individual's backgrounds for you.

We hope you will find the opportunity to use this accurate, reliable and valuable resource in the near future. A Department spokesman indicated the emphasis would be on increasing the consumption of perishables.

Of the program, U. Sullivan of Missouri asserted, " The measure drew overwhelming support from House Democrats, 90 percent from urban areas, 96 percent from the suburbs, and 87 percent from rural areas. Republican lawmakers opposed the initial measure: Johnson hailed food stamps as "a realistic and responsible step toward the fuller and wiser use of an agricultural abundance". Rooted in congressional logrolling , the act was part of a larger appropriation that raised price supports for cotton and wheat.

Rural lawmakers supported the program so that their urban colleagues would not dismantle farm subsidies. Food stamps, along with Medicaid , Head Start , and the Job Corps were foremost among the growing anti-poverty programs.

President Johnson called for a permanent food-stamp program on January 31, , as part of his " War on Poverty " platform introduced at the State of the Union a few weeks earlier. Agriculture Secretary Orville Freeman submitted the legislation on April 17, The bill eventually passed by Congress was H. As a Senator, Dole became a staunch supporter of the program, after he worked with George McGovern to produce a bipartisan solution to two of the main problems associated with food stamps: Dole told Congress regarding the new provisions, "I am confident that this bill eliminates the greedy and feeds the needy.

In April , participation topped half a million. Actual participation was , people. Participation topped 1 million in March , 2 million in October , 3 million in February , 4 million in February , 5 million one month later in March , 6 million two months later in May , 10 million in February , and 15 million in October Rapid increases in participation during this period were primarily due to geographic expansion.

The early s were a period of growth in participation, concern about the cost of providing food stamp benefits, and questions about administration, primarily timely certification. During this time, the issue was framed that would dominate food stamp legislation ever after: Three major pieces of legislation shaped this period, leading up to massive reform to follow:.

Agriculture and Consumer Protection Act of P. In accordance with P. The program was not fully implemented in Puerto Rico until November 1, Participation for July was almost 14 million. Once a person is a beneficiary of the Supplemental Security Income SSI Program he or she may be automatically eligible for Food Stamps depending on his or her state's laws.

How much money in food stamps they receive also varies by state. Supplemental Security Income was created in The Republican bill stressed targeting benefits to the neediest, simplifying administration, and tightening controls on the program; the Democratic bill focused on increasing access to those most in need and simplifying and streamlining a complicated and cumbersome process that delayed benefit delivery as well as reducing errors, and curbing abuse.

Amid all the themes, the one that became the rallying cry for FSP reform was "EPR"—eliminate the purchase requirement—because of the barrier to participation the purchase requirement represented. The integrity provisions of the new program included fraud disqualifications, enhanced Federal funding for States' anti-fraud activities, and financial incentives for low error rates.

The House Report for the legislation points out that the changes in the Food Stamp Program are needed without reference to upcoming welfare reform since "the path to welfare reform is, indeed, rocky EPR was implemented January 1, Participation that month increased 1.

The large and expensive FSP proved to be a favorite subject of close scrutiny from both the Executive Branch and Congress in the early s. Major legislation in and enacted cutbacks including:. The and legislation accomplished the following:.

Throughout this era, significant players were principally various committee chairmen: By , major changes in food stamp benefits had arrived. In December , participation finally surpassed 20 million. In March , participation hit a new high of 28 million. The mids was a period of welfare reform.

Although the Food Stamp Program was reauthorized in the Farm Bill , the welfare reform made several changes to the program, including:.

As a result of all these changes, "participation rates plummeted" in the late s, according to Slate online magazine. The fiscal year agriculture appropriations bill included two significant changes. The legislation also allowed states to use the vehicle limit they use in a TANF assistance program, if it would be result in a lower attribution of resources for the household. Many states merged the use of the EBT card for public welfare programs as well, such as cash assistance.

The move was designed to save the government money by not printing the coupons, make benefits available immediately instead of requiring the recipient to wait for mailing or picking up the booklets in person, and reduce theft and diversion. The farm bill renamed the Food Stamp Program as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program beginning October and replaced all references to "stamp" or "coupon" in federal law with "card" or "EBT.

This temporary expansion expired on November 1, , resulting in a relative benefit decrease for SNAP households; on average, benefits decreased by 5 percent. In June , Mother Jones reported that "Overall, 18 percent of all food benefits money is spent at Walmart ," and that Walmart had submitted a statement to the U.

Securities and Exchange Commission stating,. Our business operations are subject to numerous risks, factors, and uncertainties, domestically and internationally, which are outside our control. Kraft Foods , which receives "One-sixth [of its] revenues Because SNAP is a means-tested program, recipients must meet all eligibility criteria in order to receive benefits.

There are income and resource requirements for SNAP, as well as specific requirements for immigrants, elderly persons and persons with disabilities. Gross monthly income is the amount an individual makes each month before any deductions, i. There is also a resource requirement for SNAP, although eligibility requirements vary slightly from state to state.

The lack of affordable housing in urban areas means that money that could have been spent on food is spent on housing expenses. The current eligibility criteria attempt to address this, by including a deduction for "excess shelter costs".

This applies only to households that spend more than half of their net income on rent. For the purpose of this calculation, a household's net income is obtained by subtracting certain deductions from their gross before deductions income.

The adjusted net income, including the deduction for excess shelter costs, is used to determine whether a household is eligible for food stamps. Certain non-citizens, such as those admitted for humanitarian reasons and those admitted for permanent residence, may also be eligible for SNAP. Eligible household members can get SNAP benefits even if there are other members of the household that are not eligible.

Each state has a different application, which is usually available online. There is more information about various state applications processes, including locations of SNAP offices in various state, displayed on an interactive Outreach Map found on the FNS website. Additionally, restaurants operating in certain areas may be permitted to accept SNAP benefits from eligible candidates like elderly, homeless or disabled people in return for affordable meals.

Soft drinks, candy, cookies, snack crackers, and ice cream are classified as food items and are therefore eligible items. Seafood, steak, and bakery cakes are also food items and are therefore eligible items. Energy drinks which have a nutrition facts label are eligible foods, but energy drinks which have a supplement facts label are classified by the FDA as supplements, and are therefore not eligible.

Live animals and birds may not be purchased; but live fish and shellfish are eligible foods. Gift baskets containing both food and non-food items "are not eligible for purchase with SNAP benefits if the value of the non-food items exceeds 50 percent of the purchase price. Items such as birthday and other special occasion cakes are eligible as long as the value of non-edible decorations does not exceed 50 percent of the price. States are allowed under federal law to administer SNAP in different ways.

SNAP's statutes, regulations, and waivers provide State agencies with various policy options. Modernization and technology have provided States with new opportunities and options in administering the program. Certain options may facilitate program design goals, such as removing or reducing barriers to access for low-income families and individuals, or providing better support for those working or looking for work.

This flexibility helps States better target benefits to those most in need, streamline program administration and field operations, and coordinate SNAP activities with those of other programs. Some areas of differences among states include: State agencies also have an option to call their program SNAP; whether to continue to refer to their program under its former name, the Food Stamp Program; or whether to choose an alternate name.

During the recession of , SNAP participation hit an all-time high. Arguing in support for SNAP, the Food Research and Action Center argued that "putting more resources quickly into the hands of the people most likely to turn around and spend it can both boost the economy and cushion the hardships on vulnerable people who face a constant struggle against hunger. In California, the cost-benefit ratio is even higher: A summary statistical report indicated that an average of Nearly 72 percent of SNAP participants are in families with children; more than one-quarter of participants are in households with seniors or people with disabilities.

According to the United States Department of Agriculture based on a study of data gathered in Fiscal Year , statistics for the food stamp program are as follows: This increase was due to the high unemployment rate leading to higher SNAP participation and the increased benefit per person with the passing of ARRA.

Some of the states are looking for measures within the states to balance the cuts, so they would not affect the recipients of the federal aid program. While SNAP participants and other low-income nonparticipants spend similar amounts on food spending, SNAP participants tend to still experience greater food insecurity than nonparticipants. Households facing the greatest hardships are the most likely to bear the burden of applying for program benefits. Self-selection by more food-needy households into SNAP makes it difficult to observe positive effects on food security from survey data.

Because SNAP is a means-tested entitlement program, participation rates are closely related to the number of individuals living in poverty in a given period. However, ERS data shows that poverty and SNAP participation levels have continued to rise following the recession, even though unemployment rates have leveled off.

Poverty levels are the strongest correlates for program participation. A study found that SNAP benefits lead to greater expenditures on housing, transportation, and education by beneficiaries. The purpose of the Food Stamp Program as laid out in its implementation was to assist low-income households in obtaining adequate and nutritious diets. According to Peter H. Rossi , a sociologist whose work involved evaluation of social programs, "the program rests on the assumption that households with restricted incomes may skimp on food purchases and live on diets that are inadequate in quantity and quality, or, alternatively skimp on other necessities to maintain an adequate diet".

Income maintenance is money that households are able to spend on other things because they no longer have to spend it on food. Studies are inconclusive as to whether SNAP has a direct effect on the nutritional quality of food choices made by participants. Unlike other federal programs that provide food subsidies, i.

Critics of the program suggest that this lack of structure represents a missed opportunity for public health advancement and cost containment. The study also concluded that SNAP increases the likelihood that participants will consume whole fruit by 23 percentage points. However, the analysis also suggests that SNAP participation decreases participants' intake of dark green and orange vegetables by a modest amount.

A study found no evidence that SNAP increased expenditures on tobacco by beneficiaries. In March , the Washington Post reported that one-third of Woonsocket, Rhode Island 's population used food stamps, putting local merchants on a "boom or bust" cycle each month when EBT payments were deposited.

The Post stated that "a federal program that began as a last resort for a few million hungry people has grown into an economic lifeline for entire towns.

In addition to local town merchants, national retailers are starting to take in an increasing large percentage of SNAP benefits. Although trafficking does not directly increase costs to the Federal Government, [58] [59] [60] it diverts benefits from their intended purpose of helping low-income families access a nutritious diet. Also trafficking may indirectly increase costs by encouraging participants to stay in the program longer than intended, or by incentivizing new participants seeking to profit from trafficking.

The FNS aggressively acts to control trafficking by using SNAP purchase data to identify suspicious transaction patterns, conducting undercover investigations, and collaborating with other investigative agencies. Trafficking has declined over time from nearly 4 percent in the s. Although large stores accounted for

You are here: